The rapid advancement of AI sex scene generators has inevitably outpaced legal frameworks, creating a complex and often fragmented regulatory landscape. As of 2025, governments worldwide are grappling with how to address the unique challenges posed by AI-generated explicit content, particularly deepfakes. The European Union, for instance, is at the forefront with its AI Act, which came into effect in March 2025. This act introduces a detailed framework for governing AI-generated content, focusing on transparency, accountability, and user protection. Key updates include mandatory watermarking and metadata tagging for AI-created materials, tougher laws to prevent harmful uses of synthetic media, and new rules on training data sources and intellectual property. In the United States, a national AI law has not yet been enacted. Instead, the regulatory framework is emerging at the state level, creating a patchwork of rules. For example, some states are enacting legislation to clarify ownership of AI-generated content, generally vesting it with the person who provides input or directives, provided it doesn't infringe on existing copyrights., Other states are creating offenses for creating or distributing AI-generated explicit content, particularly involving children. North Dakota, for instance, is actively working to prevent the creation and distribution of sexually explicit deepfakes, with existing laws against sharing intimate images without consent and proposed legislation to make producing or distributing explicit deepfakes a class A misdemeanor. Globally, the focus is increasingly on addressing non-consensual sexually explicit deepfakes. In January 2025, the UK's Ministry of Justice announced a "crackdown" on such content, proposing new offenses for creating or requesting the creation of purported intimate images of an adult. However, it's worth noting that past recommendations have often focused on criminalizing the sharing of such images rather than their creation. Copyright law in the context of AI-generated content is also a major legal battleground. The U.S. Copyright Office, in its January 2025 report, reaffirmed that human authorship remains the cornerstone of copyright protection. Works generated solely by AI are generally not eligible for copyright, but if a human provides "significant creative input," the work might qualify., This creates a blurry line, and future cases will likely refine this standard, especially concerning AI models trained on copyrighted materials. Beyond specific laws, a broader societal effort is needed to change norms regarding the acceptability of creating and consuming non-consensual intimate content. Tech companies and social media platforms are increasingly being called upon to take responsibility for limiting the prevalence of harm, implementing rules and guidelines to prevent the creation and distribution of deepfakes, and dedicating resources to removing such content.,